Transparency alternatives to Redocly
Other API management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Redocly. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 45 that differ from Redocly on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Redocly has 3 gaps in what we could measure: Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Redocly” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Redocly | Found at Redocly, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stainlessstainless.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Stainless | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +5 | Compare |
| Svixsvix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Svix | 65/100 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Postmanpostman.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Postman | 57/100 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Apitallyapitally.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Apitally | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +4 | Compare |
| Speakeasyspeakeasy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Speakeasy | 30/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 | Compare |
| Moesifmoesif.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Moesif | 65/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Theneotheneo.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Theneo | 52/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Bump.shbump.shSee also Transparency alternatives to Bump.sh | 48/100 | 1 Data location stated | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Kongkonghq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kong | 48/100 | 1 Data location stated | 5 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Fernbuildwithfern.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fern | 43/100 | 1 Data location stated | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| ReadMereadme.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ReadMe | 43/100 | 1 Data location stated | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Graviteegravitee.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Gravitee | 35/100 | 1 Data location stated | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.