SaaS Ranking

security.txt (RFC 9116) in Research administration

It tells a researcher where to report a vulnerability instead of guessing.

1 of 25 companies we measured here publish it, that is 4%. Last checked 2026-10-18.

4% here against 11% across every category we measure. Research administration sits below the overall share for this criterion.

This page counts companies, not product entries: a company with two products in this category is one company here and two rows below.

Back to security.txt (RFC 9116) across all categories, or to Research administration.

The evidence at a glance
  • Found1
  • Not found at checked addresses24
  • Not measured5

30 companies in total. Unmeasured companies are excluded from the published share.

Published

Served at /.well-known/security.txt.

VendorWhat we found
Colabra https://www.colabra.ai/.well-known/security.txtChecked
No security.txt found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
Aixelo 1 address checkedChecked
Altmetric 1 address checkedChecked
Cayuse 1 address checkedChecked
Digital Science 1 address checkedChecked
Dimensions 1 address checkedChecked
Dryad 1 address checkedChecked
Effex OMARS 1 address checkedChecked
Elements Symplectic 1 address checkedChecked
Haplo 1 address checkedChecked
Huron Research 1 address checkedChecked
InfoEd 1 address checkedChecked
Interfolio 1 address checkedChecked
Key Solutions 1 address checkedChecked
Kuali 1 address checkedChecked
LabArchives 1 address checkedChecked
Protocols.io 1 address checkedChecked
SciNote 1 address checkedChecked
Skillsforge 1 address checkedChecked
SP Connect 1 address checkedChecked
Streamlyne 1 address checkedChecked
Vivo 1 address checkedChecked
Watermark 1 address checkedChecked
Worktribe 1 address checkedChecked
Zenodo 1 address checkedChecked
Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

VendorWhat we found
IRBNet The vendor’s robots.txt excludes us from at least one of these addresses, so this was not measured.Checked
Lasso Informatics The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked
Overton The vendor’s robots.txt excludes us from at least one of these addresses, so this was not measured.Checked
Pure Elsevier The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked
Trialfacts The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked

Other criteria in Research administration

security.txt (RFC 9116) in related categories

Found something we missed? Tell us. A correction moves that vendor into our next nightly run. That run reads the same fixed addresses we check for every vendor, not the address you send.