SaaS Ranking

Notice before subprocessors change in Court case management

A list is a snapshot. Art. 28(2) GDPR gives you a right to object, and that needs advance notice.

0 of 20 companies we measured here publish it, that is 0%. Last checked 2026-10-19.

0% here against 10% across every category we measure. Court case management sits below the overall share for this criterion.

This page counts companies, not product entries: a company with two products in this category is one company here and two rows below.

Back to Notice before subprocessors change across all categories, or to Court case management.

The evidence at a glance
  • Found0
  • Not found at checked addresses20
  • Not measured2

22 companies in total. Unmeasured companies are excluded from the published share.

Published

The vendor commits publicly to giving notice before the list changes.

None of the companies we measured here published this.

No commitment to give notice before subprocessors change found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
Cardinal Court 8 addresses checkedChecked
Conduent Courts 8 addresses checkedChecked
CourtCall 8 addresses checkedChecked
Daily Journal 8 addresses checkedChecked
eFileTexas 8 addresses checkedChecked
equivant 8 addresses checkedChecked
ETA Data Direct 8 addresses checkedChecked
File & ServeXpress 8 addresses checkedChecked
For The Record 8 addresses checkedChecked
Jano Technologies 8 addresses checkedChecked
JAVS 8 addresses checkedChecked
Journal Technologies 8 addresses checkedChecked
Karpel 8 addresses checkedChecked
Kofile 8 addresses checkedChecked
Netsential 8 addresses checkedChecked
One Legal 8 addresses checkedChecked
TrusteSolutions 8 addresses checkedChecked
US Legal Support 8 addresses checkedChecked
Verbit Courts 8 addresses checkedChecked
VIQ Solutions 8 addresses checkedChecked
Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

VendorWhat we found
Green Filing The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked
Trellis Law The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked

Other criteria in Court case management

Notice before subprocessors change in related categories

Found something we missed? Tell us. A correction moves that vendor into our next nightly run. That run reads the same fixed addresses we check for every vendor, not the address you send.