Evidence, on your terms
Explore the dataBuild your shortlist.
Every condition below is something we found at an address we checked, with the date. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
26 of 8,729 measured vendors match all 1 condition.
Vendors 26–26 of 26
Most transparent first
- found, source linked
- not found at the addresses we checked
- not measured by us
- 12 criteria in the order of the methodology, heaviest first within each group.
-
Webexwebex.comNot enough data: 3 of 12 criteria measured, so no transparency score
- Data processing agreement: not measured
- Subprocessor list: not measured
- Data location stated: not measured
- Status page with history: not found
- Public pricing: not measured
- Certifications named: not measured
- Uptime SLA with a figure: not measured
- HTTPS enforced with HSTS: found
- No third-party tracking before consent: found
- security.txt (RFC 9116): not measured
- Notice before subprocessors change: not measured
- Named privacy contact: not measured
2 found1 gap9 not measuredGaps Status page with history
What this does and does not say
- Every condition is a finding, never an absence. There is no "without US hosting" here: we did not find the location, and that is not the same as the data not being there.
- A vendor that does not match may still publish it. Somewhere we did not look, or behind a login. The list says nothing about vendors that are not on it.
- Values come from quotes we kept. A certification named for a data centre is not counted here, and neither is a finding whose own sentence does not carry it. How good our own measurement is.