Transparency alternatives to Kentik
Other Network monitoring vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Kentik. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 35 that differ from Kentik on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Kentik has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Kentik” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Kentik | Found at Kentik, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paesslerpaessler.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Paessler | 43/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| LogicMonitorlogicmonitor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LogicMonitor | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| Cambiumcambiumnetworks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cambium | 26/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
| Securepointsecurepoint.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Securepoint | 17/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 7 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 | Compare |
| Aristaarista.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Arista | 13/100 | 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | 8 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +5 | Compare |
| Auvikauvik.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Auvik | 52/100 | 1 Certifications named | 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Zscalerzscaler.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zscaler | 43/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| WatchGuardwatchguard.comSee also Transparency alternatives to WatchGuard | 39/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Ubiquitiui.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ubiquiti | 35/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Catchpointcatchpoint.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Catchpoint | 26/100 | 1 Certifications named | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Netgear Insightnetgear.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Netgear Insight | 26/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Palo Alto Networkspaloaltonetworks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Palo Alto Networks | 26/100 | 1 Certifications named | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.