Alternatives to Timeneye
Other Workforce and shift management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Timeneye does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 34 that differ from Timeneye on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Timeneye has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Timeneye does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Timeneye does not | Timeneye publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hubstaffhubstaff.com | 39/100 | 5 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Deputydeputy.com | 48/100 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| RescueTimerescuetime.com | 35/100 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Timelytimelyapp.com | 65/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| TimeCamptimecamp.com | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| 7shifts7shifts.com | 43/100 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Homebasejoinhomebase.com | 43/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Time Doctortimedoctor.com | 43/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Papershiftpapershift.com | 35/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| DeskTimedesktime.com | 30/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| EARLYtimeular.com | 30/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Kimaikimai.org | 30/100 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.