SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Aqilla

Other Accounting vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Aqilla does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 65 that differ from Aqilla on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Aqilla has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Aqilla does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Aqilla does notAqilla publishes, and they do not
AccountKitaccount-kit.com 61/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 nothing Compare
Acodeiacodei.com 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Odooodoo.com 48/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 nothing Compare
Xeroxero.com 36/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Zervantzervant.com 36/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Clear Booksclearbooks.co.uk 30/100 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
FreeAgentfreeagent.com 30/100 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Billbill.com 26/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Billomatbillomat.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Meliomelio.com 26/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Candiscandis.io 22/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Fortnoxfortnox.se 22/100 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Public pricing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.