Transparency alternatives to Workshop Software
Other Auto repair shop management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Workshop Software. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 34 that differ from Workshop Software on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Workshop Software has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Workshop Software” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Workshop Software | Found at Workshop Software, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tekmetrictekmetric.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tekmetric | 32/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 | Compare |
| CarVerticalcarvertical.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CarVertical | 35/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Shopmonkeyshopmonkey.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Shopmonkey | 35/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Fullbayfullbay.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fullbay | 26/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Orderryorderry.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Orderry | 26/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 | Compare |
| Shop-Wareshop-ware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Shop-Ware | 26/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 | Compare |
| Steersteer.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Steer | 22/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 | Compare |
| Bodynetbodynet.co.ukSee also Transparency alternatives to Bodynet | 13/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | Compare |
| GaragePluggarageplug.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GaragePlug | 13/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | Compare |
| Repair Shop Solutionsrepairshopsolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Repair Shop Solutions | 13/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | Compare |
| AutoVitalsautovitals.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AutoVitals | 9/100 | 1 Status page with history | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | Compare |
| ISIints.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ISI | 4/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.