Alternatives to Klipfolio
Other Business intelligence vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Klipfolio does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 28 that differ from Klipfolio on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Klipfolio has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Klipfolio does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Klipfolio does not | Klipfolio publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sisensesisense.com | 40/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| GoodDatagooddata.com | 35/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Hexhex.tech | 35/100 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Lightdashlightdash.com | 60/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| ThoughtSpotthoughtspot.com | 57/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Cluviocluvio.com | 55/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Countcount.co | 35/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | Compare |
| Lookerlooker.com | 35/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Metabasemetabase.com | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Databoxdatabox.com | 55/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Steepsteep.app | 40/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Deepnotedeepnote.com | 35/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.