Transparency alternatives to Event Temple
Other Catering and event management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Event Temple. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 32 that differ from Event Temple on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Event Temple has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Event Temple” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Event Temple | Found at Event Temple, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fourthfourth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fourth | 74/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Momentusgomomentus.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Momentus | 43/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Catereasecaterease.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Caterease | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| FoodStormfoodstorm.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FoodStorm | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Perfect Venueperfectvenue.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Perfect Venue | 30/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Craftablecraftable.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Craftable | 22/100 | 1 Data location stated | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Planning Podplanningpod.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Planning Pod | 22/100 | 1 Data location stated | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Cost Braincostbrain.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cost Brain | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Prismmprismm.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Prismm | 13/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Tripleseattripleseat.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tripleseat | 13/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| xtraCHEFxtrachef.comSee also Transparency alternatives to xtraCHEF | 4/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
| HoneyBook Eventshoneybook.comSee also Transparency alternatives to HoneyBook Events | 30/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.