Transparency alternatives to FoodStorm
Other Catering and event management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at FoodStorm. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 32 that differ from FoodStorm on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
FoodStorm has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at FoodStorm” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at FoodStorm | Found at FoodStorm, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fourthfourth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fourth | 74/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Event Templeeventtemple.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Event Temple | 52/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Momentusgomomentus.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Momentus | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | nothing | Compare |
| HoneyBook Eventshoneybook.comSee also Transparency alternatives to HoneyBook Events | 30/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Cost Braincostbrain.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cost Brain | 17/100 | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Total Party Plannertotalpartyplanner.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Total Party Planner | 17/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Perfect Venueperfectvenue.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Perfect Venue | 30/100 | 1 Public pricing | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Catereasecaterease.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Caterease | 26/100 | 1 Public pricing | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| CaterZencaterzen.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CaterZen | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Illumiaillumiatech.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Illumia | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| MarketManmarketman.comSee also Transparency alternatives to MarketMan | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Meezgetmeez.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Meez | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.