Transparency alternatives to Servant Keeper
Other Church and community management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Servant Keeper. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 41 that differ from Servant Keeper on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Servant Keeper has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Servant Keeper” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Servant Keeper | Found at Servant Keeper, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Planning Centerplanningcenter.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Planning Center | 57/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Text In Churchtextinchurch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Text In Church | 61/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | nothing | Compare |
| ChurchWiseAIchurchwiseai.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ChurchWiseAI | 39/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Churchsuitechurchsuite.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Churchsuite | 26/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| CHMeetingschmeetings.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CHMeetings | 35/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Multitracksmultitracks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Multitracks | 35/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Subsplashsubsplash.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Subsplash | 32/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Pushpaypushpay.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pushpay | 22/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Tithe.lytithe.lySee also Transparency alternatives to Tithe.ly | 22/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Worship Toolsworshiptools.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Worship Tools | 22/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Faithlifefaithlife.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Faithlife | 17/100 | 1 Certifications named | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| MOHIDmohid.netSee also Transparency alternatives to MOHID | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.