Alternatives to Servant Keeper
Other Church and community management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Servant Keeper does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 31 that differ from Servant Keeper on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Servant Keeper has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Servant Keeper does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Servant Keeper does not | Servant Keeper publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Planning Centerplanningcenter.com | 57/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Pushpaypushpay.com | 39/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Churchsuitechurchsuite.com | 26/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Church Community Builderchurchcommunitybuilder.com | 43/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| CHMeetingschmeetings.com | 35/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Multitracksmultitracks.com | 35/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Tithe.lytithe.ly | 35/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Worship Toolsworshiptools.com | 35/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Subsplashsubsplash.com | 32/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Church Metricschurchmetrics.com | 26/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| iKnow Churchiknowchurch.co.uk | 26/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Aplosaplos.com | 22/100 | 1 Certifications named | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.