SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to eWorkOrders

Other Maintenance management (CMMS) vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that eWorkOrders does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 24 that differ from eWorkOrders on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

eWorkOrders has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and eWorkOrders does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and eWorkOrders does noteWorkOrders publishes, and they do not
Infraspeakinfraspeak.com 30/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Limblelimble.com 30/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
MaintainXgetmaintainx.com 30/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Fiixfiixsoftware.com 30/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named nothing Compare
ServiceChannelservicechannel.com 30/100 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history 1 Public pricing Compare
Accruentaccruent.com 30/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
Cryotoscryotos.com 30/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
eMaintemaint.com 22/100 1 Data location stated 1 Public pricing Compare
Fracttalfracttal.com 17/100 1 Status page with history 1 Public pricing Compare
FTMaintenanceftmaintenance.com 13/100 1 Data location stated 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
NEXGENnexgenam.com 13/100 1 Data location stated 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Nuvolonuvolo.com 13/100 1 Certifications named 1 Public pricing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.