Transparency alternatives to ManWinWin
Other Maintenance management (CMMS) vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that ManWinWin does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 61 that differ from ManWinWin on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
ManWinWin has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and ManWinWin does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and ManWinWin does not | ManWinWin publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiixfiixsoftware.com | 35/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| UpKeepupkeep.com | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Infraspeakinfraspeak.com | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Limblelimble.com | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| MaintainXgetmaintainx.com | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Accruentaccruent.com | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| ServiceChannelservicechannel.com | 30/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Asset Infinityassetinfinity.com | 22/100 | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Cenoscocenosco.com | 22/100 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| GEOMAGIC GeoNAMgeomagic.de | 17/100 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| eMaintemaint.com | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Mendrhubmendrhub.com | 22/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.