SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to ToolSense

Other Construction management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that ToolSense does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 33 that differ from ToolSense on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

ToolSense has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and ToolSense does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and ToolSense does notToolSense publishes, and they do not
Daluxdalux.com 48/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Bluebeambluebeam.com 43/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Procoreprocore.com 43/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Bridgitgobridgit.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Hero Softwarehero-software.de 39/100 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
VisiLeanvisilean.com 30/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Newformanewforma.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
PlanRadarplanradar.com 40/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Congridcongrid.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Assignarassignar.com 23/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Aproplanaproplan.com 17/100 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Plancraftplancraft.de 10/100 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.