SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Sweet Security

Other Container and cloud workload security vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Sweet Security does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 17 that differ from Sweet Security on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Sweet Security has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Sweet Security does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Sweet Security does notSweet Security publishes, and they do not
Socketsocket.dev 48/100 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact Compare
Upwindupwind.io 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Docker Scoutdocker.com 43/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 1 Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
Endor Labsendorlabs.com 39/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history nothing Compare
Chainguardchainguard.dev 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact Compare
Anchoreanchore.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact Compare
Prisma Cloudprismacloud.io 26/100 1 Data location stated 1 Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
Cast AIcast.ai 22/100 1 Data location stated 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact Compare
Isovalentisovalent.com 22/100 1 Data location stated 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact Compare
Nirmatanirmata.com 22/100 1 Public pricing 1 Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
Armoarmosec.io 9/100 1 Status page with history 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Kubexkubex.ai 4/100 1 Certifications named 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.