SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Contractbook

Other Contract management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Contractbook. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 32 that differ from Contractbook on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Contractbook has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Contractbook” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at ContractbookFound at Contractbook, not found there
ContractSafecontractsafe.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ContractSafe 70/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Ironcladironcladapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ironclad 52/100 3 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Weagreeweagree.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Weagree 35/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Named privacy contact 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Gatekeepergatekeeperhq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Gatekeeper 39/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named Compare
Congaconga.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Conga 35/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, Certifications named Compare
LinkSquareslinksquares.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LinkSquares 30/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing Compare
Outlawgetoutlaw.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Outlaw 30/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing Compare
Spotdraftspotdraft.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Spotdraft 30/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing Compare
Agiloftagiloft.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Agiloft 22/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Zefortzefort.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zefort 30/100 1 Status page with history 1 Subprocessor list Compare
DocJurisdocjuris.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DocJuris 26/100 1 Status page with history 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named Compare
Bindbindlegal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bind 22/100 1 Data location stated 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.