Certifications named in Mass notification and critical events
Naming SOC 2 or ISO 27001 publicly is the low bar; not naming them is a signal.
3 of 12 vendors we measured here publish it, that is 25%. Last checked 2026-09-02.
25% here against 33% across every category we measure. Mass notification and critical events sits below the overall share for this criterion.
Back to Certifications named across all categories, or to Mass notification and critical events.
Published
SOC 2 or ISO 27001 named on a public page.
| Vendor | What we found |
|---|---|
| AlertMedia | https://trust.alertmedia.com/ |
| F24 | https://f24.com/no/trustcase-gmbh/ |
| Singlewire | https://www.singlewire.com/security-compliance |
No named certification found.
We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.
| Vendor | What we found |
|---|---|
| Active911 | 6 addresses checked |
| Alertus | 6 addresses checked |
| ATI Systems | 6 addresses checked |
| Bryx | 6 addresses checked |
| CallingPost | 6 addresses checked |
| Connect Rocket | 6 addresses checked |
| Mobile Text Alerts | 6 addresses checked |
| Text-Em-All | 6 addresses checked |
| Titan HST | 6 addresses checked |
Not measured
We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.
None. Every vendor here was measured for this criterion.
Found something we missed? Tell us and the next run picks it up.