SaaS Ranking

Certifications named in Privileged access management

Naming SOC 2 or ISO 27001 publicly is the low bar; not naming them is a signal.

21 of 41 companies we measured here publish it, that is 51%. Last checked 2026-10-17.

51% here against 24% across every category we measure. Privileged access management sits above the overall share for this criterion.

This page counts companies, not product entries: a company with two products in this category is one company here and two rows below.

Back to Certifications named across all categories, or to Privileged access management.

The evidence at a glance
  • Found21
  • Not found at checked addresses20
  • Not measured2

43 companies in total. Unmeasured companies are excluded from the published share.

Published

SOC 2 or ISO 27001 named on a public page.

VendorWhat we found
Admin By Request https://trust.adminbyrequest.com/Checked
Akeyless https://www.akeyless.io/trust-center/Checked
C1 https://www.c1.ai/securityChecked
Cyolo https://cyolo.io/regulatory-complianceChecked
DBHawk https://www.datasparc.com/trust-center/Checked
Delinea https://trust.delinea.com/Checked
Doppler https://www.doppler.com/securityChecked
GitGuardian https://www.gitguardian.com/Checked
Netwrix https://trust.netwrix.com/Checked
NordLayer https://nordlayer.com/compliance/Checked
Opal https://www.opal.dev/legal/trust-centerChecked
Phase https://phase.dev/security/Checked
SailPoint https://trust.sailpoint.com/Checked
Saviynt https://saviynt.com/securityChecked
Silverfort https://trust.silverfort.com/Checked
StrongDM https://www.strongdm.com/Checked
Tailscale https://tailscale.com/securityChecked
Teleport https://goteleport.com/security/Checked
Termius Vault https://termius.com/securityChecked
Trustle https://www.trustle.com/trust-centerChecked
WALLIX https://www.wallix.com/blogpost/security-compliance-made-simple-with-managed-services/Checked
No named certification found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
Apono 6 addresses checkedChecked
ARCON 6 addresses checkedChecked
Border0 6 addresses checkedChecked
Britive 6 addresses checkedChecked
Devolutions 6 addresses checkedChecked
dotenvx 6 addresses checkedChecked
Ekran System 6 addresses checkedChecked
Entro 6 addresses checkedChecked
Fudo Security 6 addresses checkedChecked
Indent 6 addresses checkedChecked
Infisical 6 addresses checkedChecked
Krontech 6 addresses checkedChecked
Lumos 6 addresses checkedChecked
Oleria 6 addresses checkedChecked
One Identity 6 addresses checkedChecked
Pragma SecureFactors 6 addresses checkedChecked
senhasegura 6 addresses checkedChecked
Sym 6 addresses checkedChecked
Twingate 6 addresses checkedChecked
Veza 6 addresses checkedChecked
Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

VendorWhat we found
BeyondTrust The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked
Heimdal The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked

Other criteria in Privileged access management

Certifications named in related categories

Found something we missed? Tell us. A correction moves that vendor into our next nightly run. That run reads the same fixed addresses we check for every vendor, not the address you send.