SaaS Ranking
Menu

Admin By Request

adminbyrequest.com · Privileged access management · checked 2026-09-14

52/100DBand D

Rank 7 of 42 in Privileged access management, where the median is 32.5.

We measured 12 of 12 criteria for Admin By Request on 2026-09-14. We found 6 with a source and did not find 6 at the addresses we checked. That is a transparency score of 52 out of 100, band D.

Overview

0 days since the newest finding, 0 since the oldest. 12 of 12 criteria measured in the last 30 days.

Evidence freshness is a statement about our measurement and is kept apart from the transparency score, which is frozen at v1. How good our own measurement is.

Transparency labelsaas-ranking.com

Admin By Request

adminbyrequest.com · Privileged access management

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
D 52of 100 Rank 7 of 42

Published commitments5 of 9 found

Measured behaviour1 of 3 found

Checked 2026-09-14. Every line links the page we found it on. A cross means we found nothing at the addresses we checked, not that the vendor has no such document. A transparency score, not a product rating.

The evidence pack carries every criterion with its source, the addresses we checked, the date and the data snapshot id – the four things a procurement file needs and a screenshot loses. We do not issue badges: a badge is the first step towards a paid placement, and there is none here.

The label is the whole measurement in one object: every criterion with its weight, the band, and the date. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Every line in it links the page we found the result on, or lists the addresses we checked. A cross means we found nothing there, not that Admin By Request has no such document.

Where Admin By Request sits in Privileged access management

  1. A0 0%
  2. B2 5%
  3. C4 10%
  4. D7 17%
  5. E12 29%
  6. F17 40%
42 vendors with a score; 1 more without a score because we could measure too little. Bands have fixed thresholds, see how the score works.

The band of Admin By Request is marked. Vendors without a score are the ones where we could measure too few criteria to rank them – a gap on our side, counted separately.

What they state

The exact figures and names we read off the pages linked below, with the sentence they stand in. This is what they publish, not what we verified about their systems.

Gaps, heaviest first

✗

Subprocessor list

weight 3 of 3

No subprocessor list found.

Checked 7 addresses on 2026-09-14.

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://adminbyrequest.com/legal/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://adminbyrequest.com/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://adminbyrequest.com/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://adminbyrequest.com/legal/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://adminbyrequest.com/trust/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://adminbyrequest.com/privacy/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://adminbyrequest.com/legal/subprocessor-list – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

Status page with history

weight 2 of 3

No public status page found.

Checked 3 addresses on 2026-09-14.

Show the 3 addresses we checked
  1. https://status.adminbyrequest.com/ – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  2. https://adminbyrequest.com/status – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://adminbyrequest.com.statuspage.io/ – Could not be fetched: fetch failed.

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

Public pricing

weight 2 of 3

No public pricing with figures found.

Checked 5 addresses on 2026-09-14.

Show the 5 addresses we checked
  1. https://adminbyrequest.com/pricing – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://adminbyrequest.com/pricing/ – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://adminbyrequest.com/plans – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://adminbyrequest.com/en/pricing – reached and rendered, no match
  5. https://adminbyrequest.com/pricing-plans – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

No third-party tracking before consent

weight 2 of 3

Third-party requests seen on the first load, before any interaction.

Checked 1 address on 2026-09-14.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://adminbyrequest.com/ – third-party requests before any interaction: adminbyrequest.de, b.sf-syn.com, cdn-cookieyes.com, fonts.googleapis.com, log.cookieyes.com, pagead2.googlesyndication.com, region1.google-analytics.com, salesiq.zohopublic.eu, static.zohocdn.com, www.google.com, www.googletagmanager.com, www.gstatic.com

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

Uptime SLA with a figure

weight 1 of 3

No uptime figure found.

Checked 6 addresses on 2026-09-14.

Show the 6 addresses we checked
  1. https://adminbyrequest.com/legal/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://adminbyrequest.com/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://adminbyrequest.com/legal/service-level-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://adminbyrequest.com/trust/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://adminbyrequest.com/uptime – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://adminbyrequest.com/legal/uptime-sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

security.txt (RFC 9116)

weight 1 of 3

No security.txt found.

Checked 1 address on 2026-09-14.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://adminbyrequest.com/.well-known/security.txt – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Evidence

The full source lists sit behind these two groups, so that the answer above stays readable.

Published, with a source 6
✓

Data processing agreement

weight 3 of 3

Published and readable without a login.

Source: https://www.adminbyrequest.com/en/data-processing-agreement · checked 2026-09-14

✓

Data location stated

weight 3 of 3

The hosting location is stated on a public page.

  • Locations named next to the hosting wording European Economic Area, European Union, Germany, Netherlands.
    Show the 4 exact wordings

    Available regions include data centers located in: European Union and European Economic Area (“EU/EEA”) EU Central (Germany) EU West (Netherlands) United States US East (Virginia) US West (Cal

    Read at https://www.adminbyrequest.com/en/privacy

    Available regions include data centers located in: European Union and European Economic Area (“EU/EEA”) EU Central (Germany) EU West (Netherlands) United States US E

    Read at https://www.adminbyrequest.com/en/privacy

    Available regions include data centers located in: European Union and European Economic Area (“EU/EEA”) EU Central (Germany) EU West (Netherlands) United States US East (Virginia) US West (California)...

    Read at https://www.adminbyrequest.com/en/privacy

    Available regions include data centers located in: European Union and European Economic Area (“EU/EEA”) EU Central (Germany) EU West (Netherlands) United States US East (Virginia) US West (California)...

    Read at https://www.adminbyrequest.com/en/privacy

Source: https://www.adminbyrequest.com/en/privacy · checked 2026-09-14

✓

HTTPS enforced with HSTS

weight 2 of 3

HTTP redirects to HTTPS and the HSTS header is set.

Source: https://adminbyrequest.com/ · checked 2026-09-14

✓

Notice before subprocessors change

weight 2 of 3

The vendor commits publicly to giving notice before the list changes.

  • Notice promised before the list changes 30 days.
    Show the exact wording

    If such alternative solution cannot be found and processor decides to proceed with the sub-processor, controller may terminate the Agreement with 30 days prior written notice.

    Read at https://www.adminbyrequest.com/en/data-processing-agreement

Source: https://www.adminbyrequest.com/en/data-processing-agreement · checked 2026-09-14

✓

Certifications named

weight 1 of 3

SOC 2 or ISO 27001 named on a public page.

  • Named on that page CSA STAR (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), Cyber Essentials (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), ISO/IEC 27001 (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), ISO/IEC 27701 (unclear from the sentence), SOC 2 (unclear from the sentence), SOC 2 Type II (not counted: the sentence does not carry it). The sentence we kept does not carry this finding on its own, so it counts in no list and no figure.
    Show the 6 exact wordings

    liance ISO/IEC 27001:2022 ISO/IEC 27701:2019 SOC 2 Cyber Essentials Cyber Essentials Plus GDPR CCPA CSA STAR Level 1 EU CRA EU Data Act TX-RAMP Documents All Public Private Get access Bulk download CO...

    Read at https://trust.adminbyrequest.com/

    Admin By Request Trust Center Admin By Request Recertified for Cyber Essentials Trust Center Start your security review View & download sensitive information Ask for information G

    Read at https://trust.adminbyrequest.com/

    We maintain SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications, encrypt all customer data with AES-256, and conduct regular third-party security au

    Read at https://trust.adminbyrequest.com/

    Compliance ISO/IEC 27001:2022 ISO/IEC 27701:2019 SOC 2 Cyber Essentials Cyber Essentials Plus GDPR CCPA CSA STAR Level 1 EU CRA EU Data Act TX-

    Read at https://trust.adminbyrequest.com/

    Compliance ISO/IEC 27001:2022 ISO/IEC 27701:2019 SOC 2 Cyber Essentials Cyber Essentials Plus GDPR CCPA CSA STAR Level 1 EU CRA EU Data Act TX-RAMP Docume

    Read at https://trust.adminbyrequest.com/

    We maintain SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications, encrypt all customer data with AES-256, and conduct regular t

    Read at https://trust.adminbyrequest.com/

Source: https://trust.adminbyrequest.com/ · checked 2026-09-14

✓

Named privacy contact

weight 1 of 3

A data protection officer or a dedicated privacy address is named.

Source: https://www.adminbyrequest.com/en/privacy · checked 2026-09-14

History

Not enough completed runs yet to draw a line. The next runs fill this in.

Compare

A shortlist holds up to six vendors across categories and lives entirely in the address of its page: share the link, bookmark it, put it in a ticket. Nothing is stored, so we do not know it exists.