Data processing agreement in GIS and mapping
Without a published DPA you cannot review the contract before you talk to sales.
2 of 8 vendors we measured here publish it, that is 25%. Last checked 2026-09-02.
25% here against 14% across every category we measure. GIS and mapping sits above the overall share for this criterion.
Back to Data processing agreement across all categories, or to GIS and mapping.
Published
Published and readable without a login.
| Vendor | What we found |
|---|---|
| Bentley Systems | https://www.bentley.com/legal/data-processing-addendum |
| Safe Software FME | https://www.safe.com/legal/#safe-software-and-the-gdpr |
No data processing agreement found.
We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.
| Vendor | What we found |
|---|---|
| Alteryx Spatial | 8 addresses checked |
| Ascent Cloud | 8 addresses checked |
| Atlas | 8 addresses checked |
| CARTO | 8 addresses checked |
| Geocortex | 8 addresses checked |
| Koordinates | 8 addresses checked |
Not measured
We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.
| Vendor | What we found |
|---|---|
| BatchGeo | The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured. |
| Sentinel Hub | The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured. |
Found something we missed? Tell us and the next run picks it up.