SaaS Ranking
Menu

Geographic Calculator Cloud: what they publish

bluemarblegeo.com · GIS and mapping · checked 2026-09-28

0/100FBand F

Rank 47 of 53 in GIS and mapping, where the median is 17.

We measured 12 of 12 criteria for Geographic Calculator Cloud on 2026-09-28. We found 0 with a source and did not find 12 at the addresses we checked. That is a transparency score of 0 out of 100, band F.

Jump to a criterion 12

Overview

1 day since the newest finding, 1 since the oldest. 12 of 12 criteria measured in the last 30 days.

Evidence freshness is a statement about our measurement and is kept apart from the transparency score, which is frozen at v1. How good our own measurement is.

Transparency labelsaas-ranking.com

Geographic Calculator Cloud

bluemarblegeo.com · GIS and mapping

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
F 0of 100 Rank 47 of 53

Published commitments0 of 9 found

Measured behaviour0 of 3 found

Checked 2026-09-28. Every line links the page we found it on. A cross means we found nothing at the addresses we checked, not that the vendor has no such document. A transparency score, not a product rating.

The evidence pack carries every criterion with its source, the addresses we checked, the date and the data snapshot id – the four things a procurement file needs and a screenshot loses. We do not issue badges: a badge is the first step towards a paid placement, and there is none here.

The label is the whole measurement in one object: every criterion with its weight, the band, and the date. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Every line in it links the page we found the result on, or lists the addresses we checked. A cross means we found nothing there, not that Geographic Calculator Cloud has no such document.

Where Geographic Calculator Cloud sits in GIS and mapping

  1. A0 0%
  2. B0 0%
  3. C2 4%
  4. D3 6%
  5. E15 28%
  6. F33 62%
53 vendors with a score; 3 more without a score because we could measure too little. Bands have fixed thresholds, see how the score works.

The band of Geographic Calculator Cloud is marked. Vendors without a score are the ones where we could measure too few criteria to rank them – a gap on our side, counted separately.

What Geographic Calculator Cloud states

The exact figures and names we read off the pages linked below, with the sentence they stand in. This is what they publish, not what we verified about their systems.

Gaps, heaviest first

✗

Data processing agreement (DPA)

weight 3 of 3

No data processing agreement found.

Checked 8 addresses on 2026-09-28.

Show the 8 addresses we checked
  1. https://bluemarblegeo.com/legal/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://bluemarblegeo.com/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://bluemarblegeo.com/legal/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://bluemarblegeo.com/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://bluemarblegeo.com/legal/data-processing-addendum – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://bluemarblegeo.com/legal/gdpr – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://bluemarblegeo.com/trust/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  8. https://bluemarblegeo.com/privacy/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Data processing agreement in GIS and mapping: 6 of 53 companies

✗

Subprocessors: the published list

weight 3 of 3

No subprocessor list found.

Checked 7 addresses on 2026-09-28.

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://bluemarblegeo.com/legal/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://bluemarblegeo.com/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://bluemarblegeo.com/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://bluemarblegeo.com/legal/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://bluemarblegeo.com/trust/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://bluemarblegeo.com/privacy/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://bluemarblegeo.com/legal/subprocessor-list – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Subprocessor list in GIS and mapping: 4 of 53 companies

✗

Data location: where they say data is hosted

weight 3 of 3

No statement about data location found.

Checked 7 addresses on 2026-09-28.

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://bluemarblegeo.com/security – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://bluemarblegeo.com/trust – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://bluemarblegeo.com/legal/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://bluemarblegeo.com/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://bluemarblegeo.com/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  6. https://bluemarblegeo.com/compliance – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://bluemarblegeo.com/legal/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Data location stated in GIS and mapping: 12 of 54 companies

✗

Status page with incident history

weight 2 of 3

No public status page found.

Checked 3 addresses on 2026-09-28.

Show the 3 addresses we checked
  1. https://status.bluemarblegeo.com/ – The name "status.bluemarblegeo.com" could not be resolved.
  2. https://bluemarblegeo.com/status – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://bluemarblegeo.com.statuspage.io/ – Could not be fetched: fetch failed.

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Status page with history in GIS and mapping: 9 of 54 companies

✗

Public pricing with figures

weight 2 of 3

No public pricing with figures found.

Checked 5 addresses on 2026-09-28.

Show the 5 addresses we checked
  1. https://bluemarblegeo.com/pricing – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://bluemarblegeo.com/pricing/ – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://bluemarblegeo.com/plans – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://bluemarblegeo.com/en/pricing – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://bluemarblegeo.com/pricing-plans – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Public pricing in GIS and mapping: 23 of 54 companies

✗

HTTPS enforced with HSTS

weight 2 of 3

No enforced HTTPS with HSTS found.

Checked 2 addresses on 2026-09-28.

Show the 2 addresses we checked
  1. http://bluemarblegeo.com/ – redirects to https://www.bluemarblegeo.com/
  2. https://bluemarblegeo.com/ – no HSTS header

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: HTTPS enforced with HSTS in GIS and mapping: 33 of 56 companies

✗weight 2 of 3

Third-party requests seen on the first load, before any interaction.

Checked 1 address on 2026-09-28.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://bluemarblegeo.com/ – third-party requests before any interaction: ad.doubleclick.net, analytics.google.com, app.usercentrics.eu, bat.bing.com, bat.bing.net, cf-enrich.prod.verisoul.ai, connect.facebook.net, consent-api.service.consent.usercentrics.eu, cta-na2.hubspot.com, gnet.prod.verisoul.ai, invalid, js-na2.hs-analytics.net, js-na2.hs-banner.com, js-na2.hs-scripts.com, js-na2.hubspot.com, js.verisoul.ai, scripts.clarity.ms, track-na2.hubspot.com, uct.service.usercentrics.eu, v1.api.service.cmp.usercentrics.eu, web.cmp.usercentrics.eu, www.clarity.ms, www.facebook.com, www.google.com

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: No third-party tracking before consent in GIS and mapping: 3 of 55 companies

✗

Notice before subprocessors change

weight 2 of 3

No commitment to give notice before subprocessors change found.

Checked 8 addresses on 2026-09-28.

Show the 8 addresses we checked
  1. https://bluemarblegeo.com/legal/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://bluemarblegeo.com/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://bluemarblegeo.com/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://bluemarblegeo.com/legal/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://bluemarblegeo.com/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://bluemarblegeo.com/legal/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://bluemarblegeo.com/trust/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  8. https://bluemarblegeo.com/legal/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Notice before subprocessors change in GIS and mapping: 4 of 53 companies

✗

Certifications named (SOC 2, ISO 27001)

weight 1 of 3

No named certification found.

Checked 6 addresses on 2026-09-28.

Show the 6 addresses we checked
  1. https://bluemarblegeo.com/security – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://bluemarblegeo.com/trust – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://bluemarblegeo.com/trust-center – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://bluemarblegeo.com/compliance – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://bluemarblegeo.com/legal/security – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://trust.bluemarblegeo.com/ – The name "trust.bluemarblegeo.com" could not be resolved.

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Certifications named in GIS and mapping: 11 of 55 companies

✗

Uptime SLA with a figure

weight 1 of 3

No uptime figure found.

Checked 6 addresses on 2026-09-28.

Show the 6 addresses we checked
  1. https://bluemarblegeo.com/legal/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://bluemarblegeo.com/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://bluemarblegeo.com/legal/service-level-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://bluemarblegeo.com/trust/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://bluemarblegeo.com/uptime – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://bluemarblegeo.com/legal/uptime-sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Uptime SLA with a figure in GIS and mapping: 4 of 53 companies

✗

security.txt (RFC 9116)

weight 1 of 3

No security.txt found.

Checked 1 address on 2026-09-28.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://bluemarblegeo.com/.well-known/security.txt – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: security.txt (RFC 9116) in GIS and mapping: 6 of 50 companies

✗

Named privacy contact (DPO or privacy address)

weight 1 of 3

No named privacy contact found.

Checked 7 addresses on 2026-09-28.

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://bluemarblegeo.com/legal/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://bluemarblegeo.com/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://bluemarblegeo.com/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  4. https://bluemarblegeo.com/legal/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://bluemarblegeo.com/legal/privacy-notice – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://bluemarblegeo.com/trust/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://bluemarblegeo.com/datenschutz – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Named privacy contact in GIS and mapping: 20 of 54 companies

Evidence

The full source lists sit behind these two groups, so that the answer above stays readable.

Nothing to show here yet.

History

100 0 2026-09-21: 0 of 1002026-09-28: 0 of 100 2026-09-21 2026-09-28
Score over the last 2 runs we measured Geographic Calculator Cloud in: 0 (2026-09-21), 0 (2026-09-28).

Compare

A shortlist holds up to six vendors across categories and lives entirely in the address of its page: share the link, bookmark it, put it in a ticket. Nothing is stored, so we do not know it exists.