SaaS Ranking

HTTPS enforced with HSTS in Laboratory information systems

We measure this ourselves on their own site. It is the cheapest security control there is.

24 of 51 companies we measured here publish it, that is 47%. Last checked 2026-10-17.

47% here against 62% across every category we measure. Laboratory information systems sits below the overall share for this criterion.

This page counts companies, not product entries: a company with two products in this category is one company here and two rows below.

Back to HTTPS enforced with HSTS across all categories, or to Laboratory information systems.

The evidence at a glance
  • Found24
  • Not found at checked addresses27
  • Not measured0

51 companies in total. Unmeasured companies are excluded from the published share.

Published

HTTP redirects to HTTPS and the HSTS header is set.

VendorWhat we found
Autoscribe https://autoscribeinformatics.com/Checked
Benchling https://benchling.com/Checked
Cenevo https://titian.co.uk/Checked
Dorner https://dorner.de/Checked
Dotmatics https://dotmatics.com/Checked
Genemod https://genemod.net/Checked
IGOR https://igorlabapp.com/Checked
Lab Thread https://labthread.com/Checked
LabCup https://labcup.net/Checked
Labfolder https://labfolder.com/Checked
Labguru https://labguru.com/Checked
Labstep https://labstep.com/Checked
Labvantage https://labvantage.com/Checked
Labware https://labware.com/Checked
LIMSey https://limsey.com/Checked
Nethealth Lab https://nethealth.com/Checked
Psyche Systems https://psychesystems.com/Checked
QbDVision https://qbdvision.com/Checked
Quartzy https://quartzy.com/Checked
Rspace https://researchspace.com/Checked
SCC Soft Computer https://softcomputer.com/Checked
Scispot https://scispot.com/Checked
SciSure https://scisure.com/Checked
Starlims https://starlims.com/Checked
No enforced HTTPS with HSTS found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
ArgoLIMS 2 addresses checkedChecked
BlazeLIMS 2 addresses checkedChecked
Certara 2 addresses checkedChecked
Chromsystems 2 addresses checkedChecked
Citrine Informatics 2 addresses checkedChecked
Clinisys 2 addresses checkedChecked
Comp Pro Med 2 addresses checkedChecked
DECIDE4ACTION 2 addresses checkedChecked
GoInformatics 2 addresses checkedChecked
HUGENX LIS 2 addresses checkedChecked
Ilis 2 addresses checkedChecked
Labcollector 2 addresses checkedChecked
LabEasy 2 addresses checkedChecked
Labnext 2 addresses checkedChecked
Limsophy 2 addresses checkedChecked
Magic Touch 2 addresses checkedChecked
Nexus Lab 2 addresses checkedChecked
Novopath 2 addresses checkedChecked
Opus L 2 addresses checkedChecked
Sapio Sciences 2 addresses checkedChecked
Sciformation 2 addresses checkedChecked
Signals 2 addresses checkedChecked
Swisslab 2 addresses checkedChecked
Wavefront Software 2 addresses checkedChecked
Wilab 2 addresses checkedChecked
Xavo 2 addresses checkedChecked
Xifin 2 addresses checkedChecked
Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

None. Every vendor here was measured for this criterion.

Other criteria in Laboratory information systems

HTTPS enforced with HSTS in related categories

Found something we missed? Tell us. A correction moves that vendor into our next nightly run. That run reads the same fixed addresses we check for every vendor, not the address you send.