Named privacy contact in eDiscovery and archiving
"Contact us" is not a privacy contact. A named officer or a dedicated address is.
5 of 12 vendors we measured here publish it, that is 42%. Last checked 2026-09-02.
42% here against 42% across every category we measure. eDiscovery and archiving sits exactly at the overall share for this criterion.
Back to Named privacy contact across all categories, or to eDiscovery and archiving.
Published
A data protection officer or a dedicated privacy address is named.
No named privacy contact found.
We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.
| Vendor | What we found |
|---|---|
| Archive360 | 7 addresses checked |
| Behavox | 7 addresses checked |
| Benno MailArchiv | 7 addresses checked |
| Casepoint | 7 addresses checked |
| Micro Focus | 7 addresses checked |
| Pagefreezer | 7 addresses checked |
| Zapproved | 7 addresses checked |
Not measured
We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.
None. Every vendor here was measured for this criterion.
Found something we missed? Tell us and the next run picks it up.