SaaS Ranking

security.txt (RFC 9116) in Expense management

It tells a researcher where to report a vulnerability instead of guessing.

40% here against 23% across every category we measure. Expense management sits above the overall share for this criterion.

Back to security.txt (RFC 9116) across all categories, or to Expense management.

Published

Served at /.well-known/security.txt.

VendorWhat we found
Payhawk https://payhawk.com/.well-known/security.txt
Ramp https://ramp.com/.well-known/security.txt
Rydoo https://www.rydoo.com/.well-known/security.txt
Spendesk https://www.spendesk.com/.well-known/security.txt

No security.txt found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
Brex 1 address checked
Circula 1 address checked
Expensify 1 address checked
Mooncard 1 address checked
Navan 1 address checked
Soldo 1 address checked

Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

VendorWhat we found
Moss The vendor’s robots.txt excludes us from at least one of these addresses, so this was not measured.
Pleo The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.

Found something we missed? Tell us and the next run picks it up.