SaaS Ranking
Menu

ExpenseIn

expensein.com · Expense management · checked 2026-09-16

43/100DBand D

Rank 8 of 28 in Expense management, where the median is 20.5.

We measured 12 of 12 criteria for ExpenseIn on 2026-09-16. We found 5 with a source and did not find 7 at the addresses we checked. That is a transparency score of 43 out of 100, band D.

Overview

0 days since the newest finding, 0 since the oldest. 12 of 12 criteria measured in the last 30 days.

Evidence freshness is a statement about our measurement and is kept apart from the transparency score, which is frozen at v1. How good our own measurement is.

Transparency labelsaas-ranking.com

ExpenseIn

expensein.com · Expense management

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
D 43of 100 Rank 8 of 28

Published commitments4 of 9 found

Measured behaviour1 of 3 found

Checked 2026-09-16. Every line links the page we found it on. A cross means we found nothing at the addresses we checked, not that the vendor has no such document. A transparency score, not a product rating.

The evidence pack carries every criterion with its source, the addresses we checked, the date and the data snapshot id – the four things a procurement file needs and a screenshot loses. We do not issue badges: a badge is the first step towards a paid placement, and there is none here.

The label is the whole measurement in one object: every criterion with its weight, the band, and the date. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Every line in it links the page we found the result on, or lists the addresses we checked. A cross means we found nothing there, not that ExpenseIn has no such document.

Where ExpenseIn sits in Expense management

  1. A0 0%
  2. B1 4%
  3. C1 4%
  4. D8 29%
  5. E2 7%
  6. F16 57%
28 vendors with a score; 3 more without a score because we could measure too little. Bands have fixed thresholds, see how the score works.

The band of ExpenseIn is marked. Vendors without a score are the ones where we could measure too few criteria to rank them – a gap on our side, counted separately.

What they state

The exact figures and names we read off the pages linked below, with the sentence they stand in. This is what they publish, not what we verified about their systems.

Gaps, heaviest first

✗

Data processing agreement

weight 3 of 3

No data processing agreement found.

Checked 8 addresses on 2026-09-16.

Show the 8 addresses we checked
  1. https://expensein.com/legal/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://expensein.com/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://expensein.com/legal/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://expensein.com/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://expensein.com/legal/data-processing-addendum – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://expensein.com/legal/gdpr – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://expensein.com/trust/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  8. https://expensein.com/privacy/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

Status page with history

weight 2 of 3

No public status page found.

Checked 3 addresses on 2026-09-16.

Show the 3 addresses we checked
  1. https://status.expensein.com/ – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  2. https://expensein.com/status – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://expensein.com.statuspage.io/ – Could not be fetched: fetch failed.

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

Public pricing

weight 2 of 3

No public pricing with figures found.

Checked 5 addresses on 2026-09-16.

Show the 5 addresses we checked
  1. https://expensein.com/pricing – reached and rendered, no match
  2. https://expensein.com/pricing/ – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://expensein.com/plans – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  4. https://expensein.com/en/pricing – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://expensein.com/pricing-plans – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

No third-party tracking before consent

weight 2 of 3

Third-party requests seen on the first load, before any interaction.

Checked 1 address on 2026-09-16.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://expensein.com/ – third-party requests before any interaction: a.storyblok.com, api.claydar.com, browser.sentry-cdn.com, bzr.openai.com, bzrcdn.openai.com, c.az.contentsquare.net, cdn-4.convertexperiments.com, cdn-cookieyes.com, cdn.claydar.com, connect.facebook.net, directory.cookieyes.com, distillery.wistia.com, embed-cloudfront.wistia.com, fast.wistia.com, fast.wistia.net, fonts.gstatic.com, img2.storyblok.com, js.zi-scripts.com, k-eu1.az.contentsquare.net, log.cookieyes.com, pagead2.googlesyndication.com, pipedream.wistia.com, region1.google-analytics.com, srm.aa.contentsquare.net, static.claydar.com, t.contentsquare.net, trck-002.clckptrl.com, ws-assets.zoominfo.com, ws.zoominfo.com, www.googletagmanager.com

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

Notice before subprocessors change

weight 2 of 3

No commitment to give notice before subprocessors change found.

Checked 8 addresses on 2026-09-16.

Show the 8 addresses we checked
  1. https://expensein.com/legal/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://expensein.com/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://expensein.com/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  4. https://expensein.com/legal/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://expensein.com/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://expensein.com/legal/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://expensein.com/trust/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  8. https://expensein.com/legal/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

Uptime SLA with a figure

weight 1 of 3

No uptime figure found.

Checked 6 addresses on 2026-09-16.

Show the 6 addresses we checked
  1. https://expensein.com/legal/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://expensein.com/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://expensein.com/legal/service-level-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://expensein.com/trust/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://expensein.com/uptime – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://expensein.com/legal/uptime-sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

security.txt (RFC 9116)

weight 1 of 3

No security.txt found.

Checked 1 address on 2026-09-16.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://expensein.com/.well-known/security.txt – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Evidence

The full source lists sit behind these two groups, so that the answer above stays readable.

Published, with a source 5
✓

Subprocessor list

weight 3 of 3

The actual list is published, not just a promise to keep one.

Source: https://www.expensein.com/sub-processors · checked 2026-09-16

✓

Data location stated

weight 3 of 3

The hosting location is stated on a public page.

  • Locations named next to the hosting wording London.
    Show the exact wording

    + − Yes, ExpenseIn is hosted in the London UK AWS Region across multiple availability zones.

    Read at https://www.expensein.com/security-and-gdpr

Source: https://www.expensein.com/security-and-gdpr · checked 2026-09-16

✓

HTTPS enforced with HSTS

weight 2 of 3

HTTP redirects to HTTPS and the HSTS header is set.

  • HSTS max-age 31536000 seconds (365 days).
    Show the exact wording

    max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Read at https://expensein.com/
  • HSTS options includeSubDomains, preload.
    Show the 2 exact wordings

    max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Read at https://expensein.com/

    max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Read at https://expensein.com/

Source: https://expensein.com/ · checked 2026-09-16

✓

Certifications named

weight 1 of 3

SOC 2 or ISO 27001 named on a public page.

  • Named on that page Cyber Essentials (unclear from the sentence), ISO 9001, ISO/IEC 27001 (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), PCI DSS. The sentence we kept does not carry this finding on its own, so it counts in no list and no figure.
    Show the 4 exact wordings

    eIn has achieved certification from WCS for ISO 9001 and ISO 27001, and has also been certified for Cyber Essentials Plus.

    Read at https://www.expensein.com/security-and-gdpr

    ExpenseIn has achieved certification from WCS for ISO 9001 and ISO 27001, and has also been certified for Cyber Essentials Plus.

    Read at https://www.expensein.com/security-and-gdpr

    And with Amazon’s certifications, including ISO 27001, you can rest assured that your information is secure.

    Read at https://www.expensein.com/security-and-gdpr

    Additionally, we are also PCI DSS certified, so you can rest assured that your payment information is protected.

    Read at https://www.expensein.com/security-and-gdpr

Source: https://www.expensein.com/security-and-gdpr · checked 2026-09-16

✓

Named privacy contact

weight 1 of 3

A data protection officer or a dedicated privacy address is named.

Source: https://www.expensein.com/privacy · checked 2026-09-16

History

Not enough completed runs yet to draw a line. The next runs fill this in.

Compare

A shortlist holds up to six vendors across categories and lives entirely in the address of its page: share the link, bookmark it, put it in a ticket. Nothing is stored, so we do not know it exists.