SaaS Ranking

security.txt (RFC 9116) in LLM tooling and evaluation

It tells a researcher where to report a vulnerability instead of guessing.

1 of 49 companies we measured here publish it, that is 2%. Last checked 2026-10-17.

2% here against 11% across every category we measure. LLM tooling and evaluation sits below the overall share for this criterion.

This page counts companies, not product entries: a company with two products in this category is one company here and two rows below.

Back to security.txt (RFC 9116) across all categories, or to LLM tooling and evaluation.

The evidence at a glance
  • Found1
  • Not found at checked addresses48
  • Not measured1

50 companies in total. Unmeasured companies are excluded from the published share.

Published

Served at /.well-known/security.txt.

VendorWhat we found
Orq https://orq.ai/.well-known/security.txtChecked
No security.txt found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
Agenta 1 address checkedChecked
AgentOps 1 address checkedChecked
Arize 1 address checkedChecked
Bifrost 1 address checkedChecked
Braintrust 1 address checkedChecked
Chainlit 1 address checkedChecked
Cognee 1 address checkedChecked
Confident AI 1 address checkedChecked
Deepchecks 1 address checkedChecked
Dify 1 address checkedChecked
Fiddler 1 address checkedChecked
Flowise 1 address checkedChecked
Freeplay 1 address checkedChecked
Galileo 1 address checkedChecked
Gentrace 1 address checkedChecked
Giskard 1 address checkedChecked
Guardrails AI 1 address checkedChecked
Helicone 1 address checkedChecked
HiddenLayer 1 address checkedChecked
Humanloop 1 address checkedChecked
Lakera 1 address checkedChecked
Laminar 1 address checkedChecked
LangChain 1 address checkedChecked
Langfuse 1 address checkedChecked
LangWatch 1 address checkedChecked
LastMile AI 1 address checkedChecked
Latitude 1 address checkedChecked
Letta 1 address checkedChecked
Literal AI 1 address checkedChecked
LlamaIndex 1 address checkedChecked
Lunary 1 address checkedChecked
Mastra 1 address checkedChecked
Mem0 1 address checkedChecked
Openlayer 1 address checkedChecked
Parea 1 address checkedChecked
Patronus AI 1 address checkedChecked
Portkey 1 address checkedChecked
PromptFoo 1 address checkedChecked
PromptLayer 1 address checkedChecked
Ragas 1 address checkedChecked
Respan 1 address checkedChecked
Supermemory 1 address checkedChecked
Traceloop 1 address checkedChecked
Vectorize 1 address checkedChecked
Vellum 1 address checkedChecked
Velvet 1 address checkedChecked
WhyLabs 1 address checkedChecked
Zep 1 address checkedChecked
Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

VendorWhat we found
Athina The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked

Other criteria in LLM tooling and evaluation

security.txt (RFC 9116) in related categories

Found something we missed? Tell us. A correction moves that vendor into our next nightly run. That run reads the same fixed addresses we check for every vendor, not the address you send.