SaaS Ranking

security.txt (RFC 9116) in Data integration

It tells a researcher where to report a vulnerability instead of guessing.

17% here against 23% across every category we measure. Data integration sits below the overall share for this criterion.

Back to security.txt (RFC 9116) across all categories, or to Data integration.

Published

Served at /.well-known/security.txt.

VendorWhat we found
Confluent https://www.confluent.io/.well-known/security.txt
Hevo Data https://hevodata.com/.well-known/security.txt
Keboola https://www.keboola.com/.well-known/security.txt
Redpanda https://www.redpanda.com/.well-known/security.txt
Y42 https://www.y42.com/.well-known/security.txt

No security.txt found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
Airbyte 1 address checked
Astronomer 1 address checked
Dagster 1 address checked
Datafold 1 address checked
dbt Labs 1 address checked
Estuary 1 address checked
Fivetran 1 address checked
Hightouch 1 address checked
Informatica 1 address checked
Integrate.io 1 address checked
Matillion 1 address checked
Meltano 1 address checked
Nexla 1 address checked
Polytomic 1 address checked
Portable 1 address checked
Prefect 1 address checked
Rivery 1 address checked
RudderStack 1 address checked
Segment 1 address checked
Snowplow 1 address checked
Stitch 1 address checked
StreamSets 1 address checked
Talend 1 address checked
Weld 1 address checked

Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

VendorWhat we found
Striim The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.

Found something we missed? Tell us and the next run picks it up.