SaaS Ranking

security.txt (RFC 9116) in Marketing automation

It tells a researcher where to report a vulnerability instead of guessing.

14% here against 23% across every category we measure. Marketing automation sits below the overall share for this criterion.

Back to security.txt (RFC 9116) across all categories, or to Marketing automation.

Published

Served at /.well-known/security.txt.

VendorWhat we found
Airship https://www.airship.com/.well-known/security.txt
Braze https://braze.com/.well-known/security.txt
Ortto https://ortto.com/.well-known/security.txt

No security.txt found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
Act-On 1 address checked
Attentive 1 address checked
Beehiiv 1 address checked
Bloomreach 1 address checked
CleverTap 1 address checked
Customerly 1 address checked
Encharge 1 address checked
GetResponse 1 address checked
Insider 1 address checked
Iterable 1 address checked
Keap 1 address checked
Loops 1 address checked
Manago AI 1 address checked
Mapp 1 address checked
MoEngage 1 address checked
Postscript 1 address checked
SharpSpring 1 address checked
Userlist 1 address checked
Vero 1 address checked

Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

VendorWhat we found
Drip The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.
Emarsys The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.
Exponea The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.
Netcore The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.

Found something we missed? Tell us and the next run picks it up.