SaaS Ranking

security.txt (RFC 9116) in Museum collections management

It tells a researcher where to report a vulnerability instead of guessing.

0 of 26 companies we measured here publish it, that is 0%. Last checked 2026-10-17.

0% here against 11% across every category we measure. Museum collections management sits below the overall share for this criterion.

This page counts companies, not product entries: a company with two products in this category is one company here and two rows below.

Back to security.txt (RFC 9116) across all categories, or to Museum collections management.

The evidence at a glance
  • Found0
  • Not found at checked addresses26
  • Not measured6

32 companies in total. Unmeasured companies are excluded from the published share.

Published

Served at /.well-known/security.txt.

None of the companies we measured here published this.

No security.txt found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
Archivesspace 1 address checkedChecked
Artbutler 1 address checkedChecked
Arternal 1 address checkedChecked
Artlogic 1 address checkedChecked
Artwork Archive 1 address checkedChecked
Atom 1 address checkedChecked
Catalogit 1 address checkedChecked
Collectorsystems 1 address checkedChecked
Digitale Sammlungen 1 address checkedChecked
Ehive 1 address checkedChecked
First Rumos 1 address checkedChecked
Gallery Systems 1 address checkedChecked
Heurist 1 address checkedChecked
Islandora 1 address checkedChecked
Libnova 1 address checkedChecked
Lucidea 1 address checkedChecked
Museum Digital 1 address checkedChecked
Nodegoat 1 address checkedChecked
Nomisma 1 address checkedChecked
Omeka 1 address checkedChecked
Past Perfect 1 address checkedChecked
Preservica 1 address checkedChecked
Robotron Daphne 1 address checkedChecked
Tainacan 1 address checkedChecked
Vernon 1 address checkedChecked
Wisski 1 address checkedChecked
Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

VendorWhat we found
Arkivum The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked
Collectiveaccess None of the addresses could be reached, so this was not measured.Checked
Faust The vendor’s robots.txt excludes us from at least one of these addresses, so this was not measured.Checked
Hida The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked
Imdas The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked
Museumplus The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked

Other criteria in Museum collections management

security.txt (RFC 9116) in related categories

Found something we missed? Tell us. A correction moves that vendor into our next nightly run. That run reads the same fixed addresses we check for every vendor, not the address you send.