SaaS Ranking

security.txt (RFC 9116) in Social media management

It tells a researcher where to report a vulnerability instead of guessing.

4% here against 23% across every category we measure. Social media management sits below the overall share for this criterion.

Back to security.txt (RFC 9116) across all categories, or to Social media management.

Published

Served at /.well-known/security.txt.

VendorWhat we found
Sprinklr https://www.sprinklr.com/.well-known/security.txt

No security.txt found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
Agorapulse 1 address checked
Blog2Social 1 address checked
Brandwatch 1 address checked
Buffer 1 address checked
ContentStudio 1 address checked
CoSchedule 1 address checked
Dash Social 1 address checked
Emplifi 1 address checked
Fanpage Karma 1 address checked
Hootsuite 1 address checked
Iconosquare 1 address checked
Khoros 1 address checked
Later 1 address checked
Loomly 1 address checked
Metricool 1 address checked
Planable 1 address checked
Publer 1 address checked
Sendible 1 address checked
SocialPilot 1 address checked
Sprout Social 1 address checked
Statusbrew 1 address checked
Storyheap 1 address checked
Swat.io 1 address checked
Vista Social 1 address checked

Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

VendorWhat we found
Napoleon Cat The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.

Found something we missed? Tell us and the next run picks it up.