SaaS Ranking

Status page with history in Digital asset management

A status page without past incidents tells you nothing about reliability.

41% here against 49% across every category we measure. Digital asset management sits below the overall share for this criterion.

Back to Status page with history across all categories, or to Digital asset management.

Published

A public status page with incident history.

VendorWhat we found
Acquia DAM https://status.acquia.com/
Air https://status.air.inc/
Aprimo https://status.aprimo.com/
Brandfolder https://status.smartsheet.com/
Bynder https://status.bynder.com/
Cloudinary https://status.cloudinary.com/
Frontify https://status.frontify.com/
Imgix https://status.imgix.com/
Papirfly https://status.papirfly.com/
Scaleflex https://status.scaleflex.com/
Uploadcare https://status.uploadcare.com/

No public status page found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
Canto 3 addresses checked
Censhare 3 addresses checked
Dash 3 addresses checked
Filecamp 3 addresses checked
Fotoware 3 addresses checked
ImageKit 3 addresses checked
Keepeek 3 addresses checked
MediaValet 3 addresses checked
Orange Logic 3 addresses checked
Phraseanet 3 addresses checked
Pics.io 3 addresses checked
Pimcore 3 addresses checked
ResourceSpace 3 addresses checked
Sitecore Content Hub 3 addresses checked
Tenovos 3 addresses checked
Wedia 3 addresses checked

Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

None. Every vendor here was measured for this criterion.

Found something we missed? Tell us and the next run picks it up.