Notice before subprocessors change in Subscription management and billing
A list is a snapshot. Art. 28(2) GDPR gives you a right to object, and that needs advance notice.
4 of 10 companies we measured here publish it, that is 40%. Last checked 2026-09-16.
40% here against 9% across every category we measure. Subscription management and billing sits above the overall share for this criterion.
This page counts companies, not product entries: a company with two products in this category is one company here and two rows below.
Back to Notice before subprocessors change across all categories, or to Subscription management and billing.
Published
The vendor commits publicly to giving notice before the list changes.
No commitment to give notice before subprocessors change found.
We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.
| Vendor | What we found |
|---|---|
| AdvantageCS | 8 addresses checked |
| Autumn | 8 addresses checked |
| Cerillion | 8 addresses checked |
| Oak Software | 8 addresses checked |
| OneBill | 8 addresses checked |
| Upmind | 8 addresses checked |
Not measured
We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.
| Vendor | What we found |
|---|---|
| Subscription DNA | This vendor was not measured because our run stopped waiting for it. |
Found something we missed? Tell us. A correction moves that vendor into our next nightly run. That run reads the same fixed addresses we check for every vendor, not the address you send.