Public pricing in Subscription management and billing
Hidden pricing moves the first comparison into a sales call.
3 of 10 companies we measured here publish it, that is 30%. Last checked 2026-09-16.
30% here against 37% across every category we measure. Subscription management and billing sits below the overall share for this criterion.
This page counts companies, not product entries: a company with two products in this category is one company here and two rows below.
Back to Public pricing across all categories, or to Subscription management and billing.
Published
Actual numbers on a public page.
| Vendor | What we found |
|---|---|
| Autumn | https://useautumn.com/pricing |
| Dodo Payments | https://dodopayments.com/pricing |
| SubJolt | https://www.subjolt.com/pricing/ |
No public pricing with figures found.
We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.
| Vendor | What we found |
|---|---|
| AdvantageCS | 5 addresses checked |
| BillingPlatform | 5 addresses checked |
| Cerillion | 5 addresses checked |
| Oak Software | 5 addresses checked |
| OneBill | 5 addresses checked |
| Polar | 5 addresses checked |
| Upmind | 5 addresses checked |
Not measured
We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.
| Vendor | What we found |
|---|---|
| Subscription DNA | This vendor was not measured because our run stopped waiting for it. |
Found something we missed? Tell us. A correction moves that vendor into our next nightly run. That run reads the same fixed addresses we check for every vendor, not the address you send.