SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Bitquery

Other Crypto compliance and blockchain analytics vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Bitquery does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 26 that differ from Bitquery on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Bitquery has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Bitquery does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Bitquery does notBitquery publishes, and they do not
TaxBittaxbit.com 48/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
21 Analytics21analytics.co 22/100 4 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
CoinTrackingcointracking.info 39/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Notabenenotabene.id 39/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Chainalysischainalysis.com 35/100 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Scorechainscorechain.com 35/100 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Ellipticelliptic.co 30/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Bitwavebitwave.io 22/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Blockpitblockpit.io 35/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
CoinLedgercoinledger.io 26/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Data location stated Compare
Integralintegral.xyz 26/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Public pricing Compare
Ledgibleledgible.io 22/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Data location stated Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.