Transparency alternatives to Flieber
Other Demand planning vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Flieber. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 32 that differ from Flieber on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Flieber has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Flieber” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Flieber | Found at Flieber, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kinaxiskinaxis.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kinaxis | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| o9 Solutionso9solutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to o9 Solutions | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| RELEXrelexsolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RELEX | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| ABC-Planabc-plan.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ABC-Plan | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Slimstockslimstock.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Slimstock | 17/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Inventory Plannerinventory-planner.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Inventory Planner | 13/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| StockTrimstocktrim.comSee also Transparency alternatives to StockTrim | 30/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Peakpeak.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Peak | 26/100 | 1 Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Predikoprediko.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Prediko | 22/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Tooliotoolio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Toolio | 22/100 | 1 Certifications named | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Onebeatonebeat.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Onebeat | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| ToolsGrouptoolsgroup.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ToolsGroup | 17/100 | 1 Certifications named | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.