SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Jarvis Analytics

Other Dental practice software vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Jarvis Analytics does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 15 that differ from Jarvis Analytics on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Jarvis Analytics has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Jarvis Analytics does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Jarvis Analytics does notJarvis Analytics publishes, and they do not
Dentalinteldentalintel.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Public pricing Compare
Aditadit.com 26/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Dentallydentally.co 26/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Vyne Dentalvynedental.com 18/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Carestream Dentalcarestreamdental.com 17/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Public pricing Compare
Denticonplanetdds.com 17/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Public pricing Compare
Carestackcarestack.com 17/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Curve Dentalcurvedental.com 17/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Nexhealthnexhealth.com 17/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Dentrixdentrix.com 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Public pricing Compare
Planmecaplanmeca.com 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Public pricing Compare
3shape3shape.com 4/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.