Transparency alternatives to Fotor
Other Design and prototyping vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Fotor does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 27 that differ from Fotor on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Fotor has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Fotor does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Fotor does not | Fotor publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recraftrecraft.ai | 61/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Photoroomphotoroom.com | 48/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Splinespline.design | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| PicMonkeypicmonkey.com | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | nothing | Compare |
| Pencilpencil.dev | 35/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| UXPinuxpin.com | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Knapsackknapsack.cloud | 17/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| ZeroLightzerolight.com | 17/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Erasereraser.io | 30/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Supernovasupernova.io | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Animaanimaapp.com | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | nothing | Compare |
| Infograminfogram.com | 22/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.