Transparency alternatives to Pickcel
Other Digital signage vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Pickcel does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 51 that differ from Pickcel on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Pickcel has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Pickcel does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Pickcel does not | Pickcel publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yodeckyodeck.com | 65/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Appspaceappspace.com | 52/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Poppulopoppulo.com | 48/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| ScreenCloudscreencloud.com | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Xiboxibo.org.uk | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Rocket Alumnirocketalumnisolutions.com | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Carouselcarouselsignage.com | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Navorinavori.com | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Broadsignbroadsign.com | 35/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Disedise.com | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Revel Digitalreveldigital.com | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Screenlyscreenly.io | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.