Transparency alternatives to Eido
Other Endpoint management and security vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Eido does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 37 that differ from Eido on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Eido has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Eido does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Eido does not | Eido publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Addigyaddigy.com | 87/100 | 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 | nothing | Compare |
| Malwarebytesmalwarebytes.com | 83/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| NinjaOneninjaone.com | 52/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| SentinelOnesentinelone.com | 48/100 | 5 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Hexnodehexnode.com | 62/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Fleetfleetdm.com | 48/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Levellevel.io | 48/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Automoxautomox.com | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Scalefusionscalefusion.com | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Action1action1.com | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| PDQ Connectpdq.com | 30/100 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Kaseyakaseya.com | 39/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.