Transparency alternatives to Erply
Other ERP for mid-market vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Erply. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 85 that differ from Erply on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Erply has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Erply” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Erply | Found at Erply, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scopevisioscopevisio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Scopevisio | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +2 | Compare |
| Axix Technologiesaxixtechnologies.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Axix Technologies | 35/100 | 1 Certifications named | 3 No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Frappefrappe.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Frappe | 35/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| INNERGYinnergy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to INNERGY | 35/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Myfactorymyfactory.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Myfactory | 17/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| OptiPro Manufacturing Cloudoptiproerp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OptiPro Manufacturing Cloud | 17/100 | 1 Certifications named | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| AFASafas.nlSee also Transparency alternatives to AFAS | 13/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +2 | Compare |
| BlueBox Business Systemsblueboxonline.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BlueBox Business Systems | 13/100 | 1 Certifications named | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +2 | Compare |
| AllSolutionsallsolutions.nlSee also Transparency alternatives to AllSolutions | 10/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| ACTouchactouch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ACTouch | 4/100 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | 6 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +3 | Compare |
| Afterbuyafterbuy.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Afterbuy | 4/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 6 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +3 | Compare |
| Proginov ERPproginov.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Proginov ERP | 4/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 6 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +3 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.