Transparency alternatives to Pliant
Other Financial planning and close vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Pliant does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 48 that differ from Pliant on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Pliant has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Pliant does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Pliant does not | Pliant publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leapfinleapfin.com | 61/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Drivetraindrivetrain.ai | 52/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Venavenasolutions.com | 52/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Alephgetaleph.com | 39/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| BlackLineblackline.com | 38/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| SecureSheetsecuresheet.com | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Datarailsdatarails.com | 30/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Pigmentpigment.com | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Planfulplanful.com | 30/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Anaplananaplan.com | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Trintechtrintech.com | 22/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| FloQastfloqast.com | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.