Transparency alternatives to Optix
Other Fitness and studio management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Optix. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 45 that differ from Optix on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Optix has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Optix” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Optix | Found at Optix, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deskbirddeskbird.comSee also Transparency alternatives to deskbird | 52/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Everfiteverfit.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Everfit | 30/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| WellnessLivingwellnessliving.comSee also Transparency alternatives to WellnessLiving | 40/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Glofoxglofox.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Glofox | 22/100 | 1 Certifications named | 4 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Nexudusnexudus.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nexudus | 22/100 | 1 Certifications named | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Fitogramfitogram.proSee also Transparency alternatives to Fitogram | 9/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
| Wodifywodify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Wodify | 39/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Arboxarboxapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Arbox | 35/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Momencemomence.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Momence | 35/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| TrueCoachtruecoach.coSee also Transparency alternatives to TrueCoach | 35/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Clubworxclubworx.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Clubworx | 30/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Cobotcobot.meSee also Transparency alternatives to Cobot | 30/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.