SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to OpenCage

Other GIS and mapping vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that OpenCage does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 52 that differ from OpenCage on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

OpenCage has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and OpenCage does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and OpenCage does notOpenCage publishes, and they do not
Mapboxmapbox.com 61/100 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 nothing Compare
Planetplanet.com 57/100 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
GIS Cloudgiscloud.com 55/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Safe Software FMEsafe.com 52/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 1 Public pricing Compare
LightBoxlightboxre.com 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Bentley Systemsbentley.com 43/100 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 1 Public pricing Compare
MetaLocatormetalocator.com 38/100 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Feltfelt.com 30/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Pointlypointly.ai 39/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
UP42up42.com 38/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
eSpatialespatial.com 35/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named nothing Compare
Skyfiskyfi.com 35/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.