SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Blynk

Other IoT platforms and connectivity vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Blynk does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from Blynk on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Blynk has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Blynk does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Blynk does notBlynk publishes, and they do not
Balenabalena.io 65/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 1 Data location stated Compare
Memfaultmemfault.com 57/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 nothing Compare
Simbasesimbase.com 30/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Particleparticle.io 48/100 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Aerisaeris.com 26/100 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
EMnifyemnify.com 35/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Litmuslitmus.io 32/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 1 Data location stated Compare
Onomondoonomondo.com 30/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
Hologramhologram.io 22/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Siemens Insightssiemens.com 22/100 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Ubidotsubidots.com 39/100 1 Status page with history nothing Compare
Monogotomonogoto.io 30/100 1 Status page with history 1 Public pricing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.