SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Simbase

Other IoT platforms and connectivity vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Simbase does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 26 that differ from Simbase on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Simbase has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Simbase does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Simbase does notSimbase publishes, and they do not
Balenabalena.io 65/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Memfaultmemfault.com 57/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Particleparticle.io 48/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Certifications named Compare
Ubidotsubidots.com 39/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
EMnifyemnify.com 35/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Blynkblynk.io 30/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
Emteriaemteria.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
Monogotomonogoto.io 30/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
Aerisaeris.com 26/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 Compare
ThingsBoardthingsboard.io 26/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
Eseyeeseye.com 22/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 5 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 Compare
Litmuslitmus.io 32/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.