SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to TagoIO

Other IoT platforms and connectivity vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at TagoIO. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 43 that differ from TagoIO on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

TagoIO has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at TagoIO” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at TagoIOFound at TagoIO, not found there
Memfaultmemfault.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Memfault 57/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Particleparticle.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Particle 48/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
ThingsBoardthingsboard.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to ThingsBoard 48/100 4 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
EMnifyemnify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EMnify 35/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Siemens Insightssiemens.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Siemens Insights 30/100 4 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Balenabalena.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Balena 61/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Certifications named Compare
Datacakedatacake.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Datacake 39/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Mendermender.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Mender 30/100 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Monogotomonogoto.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Monogoto 30/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Onomondoonomondo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Onomondo 30/100 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Qbeeqbee.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Qbee 30/100 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Helinhelindata.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Helin 22/100 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.