Transparency alternatives to TagoIO
Other IoT platforms and connectivity vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that TagoIO does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 45 that differ from TagoIO on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
TagoIO has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and TagoIO does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and TagoIO does not | TagoIO publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Memfaultmemfault.com | 57/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Particleparticle.io | 48/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| EMnifyemnify.com | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Balenabalena.io | 65/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Datacakedatacake.co | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Mendermender.io | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Monogotomonogoto.io | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Onomondoonomondo.com | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Qbeeqbee.io | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Simbasesimbase.com | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Helinhelindata.com | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Siemens Insightssiemens.com | 22/100 | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.