SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Fibery

Other Knowledge base and wiki vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Fibery does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from Fibery on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Fibery has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Fibery does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Fibery does notFibery publishes, and they do not
Codacoda.io 39/100 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Gurugetguru.com 30/100 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Docmostdocmost.com 43/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Obsidianobsidian.md 39/100 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent 1 Certifications named Compare
Slabslab.com 39/100 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Tettratettra.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
BookStackbookstackapp.com 22/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Public pricing, Certifications named Compare
Waybookwaybook.com 30/100 1 Data location stated 1 Certifications named Compare
Anytypeanytype.io 26/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 1 Certifications named Compare
Helpjuicehelpjuice.com 26/100 1 Status page with history 1 Certifications named Compare
Nuclinonuclino.com 22/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 1 Public pricing Compare
HelpDocshelpdocs.io 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.