Alternatives to Agenta
Other LLM tooling and evaluation vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Agenta does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 27 that differ from Agenta on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Agenta has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Agenta does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Agenta does not | Agenta publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Langfuselangfuse.com | 74/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Openlayeropenlayer.com | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Fiddlerfiddler.ai | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Braintrustbraintrust.dev | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| HiddenLayerhiddenlayer.com | 39/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Lunarylunary.ai | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Lakeralakera.ai | 35/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Confident AIconfident-ai.com | 48/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Arizearize.com | 39/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Freeplayfreeplay.ai | 17/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| LastMile AIlastmileai.dev | 17/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Giskardgiskard.ai | 13/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.