Transparency alternatives to Zello
Other Mass notification and critical events vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Zello. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 38 that differ from Zello on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Zello has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Zello” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Zello | Found at Zello, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Singlewiresinglewire.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Singlewire | 43/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| AlertMediaalertmedia.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AlertMedia | 52/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Juvarejuvare.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Juvare | 39/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| F24f24.comSee also Transparency alternatives to F24 | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | Compare |
| Divera 247divera247.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Divera 247 | 26/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Genasysgenasys.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Genasys | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| GroupAlarmgroupalarm.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GroupAlarm | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Omnilertomnilert.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Omnilert | 17/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| D4Hd4h.comSee also Transparency alternatives to D4H | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| IamRespondingiamresponding.comSee also Transparency alternatives to IamResponding | 23/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Active911active911.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Active911 | 22/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Agility Recoveryagilityrecovery.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Agility Recovery | 22/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.